Reserve Transparency Isn’t Enough: The Next Phase of Stablecoin Oversight
For years, the stablecoin debate has focused heavily on reserves. Are the assets really there? What are they invested in? Are they liquid? Has an
Last week, it was reported that a New York man was charged with operating an unlawful money transmitting business for illegally selling bitcoin. According to the U.S. Attorney’s Office, the man allegedly conducted a sale of Bitcoin with an undercover federal agent late last year, and unlawfully operated a Bitcoin exchange, between August 2014 and December 2015, with net sales of approximately $200,000.
Simply stated, the government contends that he did not register as an MSB. Such a charge is relatively easy to prove and requires limited investigative resources. It’s low-hanging fruit for authorities. It continues to surprise many within both the compliance and regulatory community that there are still bitcoin companies failing to properly register.
Perhaps the biggest irony is that if you are an unregistered MSB, FinCEN still expects you to have executed on your compliance obligations from day one. For those in this situation, FinCEN could pursue penalties for unlawful money transmitting, as well as failure to implement an adequate AML program and failure to maintain adequate record-keeping, among other deficiencies.
For years, the stablecoin debate has focused heavily on reserves. Are the assets really there? What are they invested in? Are they liquid? Has an
Introduction: The Moment That Defines a Stablecoin Issuer Stablecoin issuers face one of the most difficult operational questions in digital finance: when should they freeze
Surveillance Pricing and AI: Why Regulators Are Scrutinizing Algorithmic Price-Setting Artificial intelligence is rapidly changing how businesses make decisions. From fraud detection and customer service